Rotary Club of Del Mar California Incorporated
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 956095740
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2012–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Del Mar, CA, USA
- Phone
- 8585252033
- Rating
- 41
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $50,399
- Expenses
- $118,322
- Assets
- $39,537
- Liabilities
- $35,263
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
13 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Toni Mercaro (President)
- Patrick Caughey (Vice President)
- Steven McDowell (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Susan Morande (Secretary)
- Kathleen Reed (Treasurer)
- Ward Jim Davies (Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The main objective of Rotary is service - in the community, the workplace, and throughout the world. Rotarians foster and encourage the ideal of 'Service above Self' through volunteering in communities at home and abroad to support education and job training, provide clean water, combat hunger, improve health and sanitation, and eradicate polio.
What it reported doing in 2024
Support of Public Health, Community, and Social Services - Sponsored Holiday gift baskets and gift cards to underprivileged families, provided donations to San Diego Food Bank and Millions of meals for food deprived population. supported Canine Companions for service animals for special needs individuals, provided summer camp funding for San Dieguito Boys and Girls club. Funded rescue equipment for City of Del Mar Life Guards. Supported 5 Eagle Scout projects. Sponsored Del Mar Little League. Sponsored computer education/training for Solutions for Change (women's shelter). Supported CRC women? s shelter.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 13
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 17
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 17%; rating input score 17
- Program expense ratio: 7.2%; rating input score 7
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -134.8%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.33; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.89; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -21.1% per year; rating input score 0; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -2.7% per year; rating input score 0; 41st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 0.1% per year; rating input score 100; 39th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 17% of revenue deployed · 7.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments · $9K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 13 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 8 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Filing history: 9 filing years from 2012 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 17/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 7/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 6/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 23/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 6/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: California registration: this organization is not authorized to operate as a charity in California.