Rotary Club of D5280 Rotarians Fighting Human Trafficking
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 861999612
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2020–2022
- Forms available
- Form 990 2022
- Location
- Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Phone
- 3107391307
- Rating
- 39
- Verdict
- REVIEW
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Alliance/Advocacy
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $10,070
- Expenses
- $9,995
- Assets
- $6,752
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JENNA BRUCE (President)
People named in this filing
- VANESSA GALVAN-REDDIX (Chairman)
- JENNA BRUCE (President)
- JULES EDWARDS (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Rotary club of 5280 rotarians fighting human trafficking mission is to raise awareness of the issue of human trafficking and to assist victims and survivors of human trafficking through collaberation with nonprogits and governmental agencies dedicated to this issue.
What it reported doing in 2022
Rotary club of 5280 rotarians fighting human trafficking activities encompass numerous community, international outreach events.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Membership-supported. 70% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 12
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 0
- Sustainability: 49
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 13.4%; rating input score 13
- Program expense ratio: 13.5%; rating input score 14
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 0 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Fail
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 0.7%; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.68; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 100% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 33% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 47.1% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 13.4% of revenue deployed · 13.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 4 board members independent · 0 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 13 of 13 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2020 to 2022
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 13/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 14/100.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 6 of 6 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 17/100.
- Review — Grant Readiness: California registration: this organization could not be resolved against the register, so the check is unfinished.