Roswell Fire & Police Foundation Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 201786074
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2014–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2013
- Location
- Atlanta, GA, USA
- Phone
- 7705968255
- Rating
- 67
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Fire Prevention
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $12,820
- Expenses
- $11,830
- Assets
- $218,958
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- TONY PAPOUTSIS (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- TONY PAPOUTSIS (PRESIDENT)
- CRYSTAL VICK (SECRETARY)
- RAYMOND C VOGHT IV (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Firefighters and police officers realize from the start that they will not get rich in the career paths they chose so they augment their salaries by working part-time jobs. While the benefits of their primary job covers medical expenses and sick leave covers primary income, an injured firefighter or police officer lose their part-time earnings and in many cases this places a strain on the families' financial stability. In these cases roswell fire and police foundation assesses the families' financial status and provides the financial assistance to maintain financial stability. In cases where the firefighter or police officer dies from an injury or illness, the rfpf provides immediate financial relief to cover the family's immediate needs. In addition to financial assistance, the roswell fire and police foundation assigns a family liaison officer to coordinate other needs the family may have. The family liaison officer inquires what the family needs to ensure normal domestic chores are
What it reported doing in 2024
The foundation provided assistance to 5 public safety professionals in their time of need.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 67% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 61% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 60
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 62
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 63.4%; rating input score 63
- Program expense ratio: 53.7%; rating input score 54
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 7.7%; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 18.51; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -3.7% per year; rating input score 0; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -7.7% per year; rating input score 0; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 12.2% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 63.4% of revenue deployed · 53.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $6K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 10 filing years from 2014 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 54/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 59/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.