Ross Valley Little League
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 946102259
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2013–2021
- Forms available
- Form 990 2012, Form 990-EZ 2021
- Location
- Greenbrae, CA, USA
- Phone
- 4154485518
- Rating
- 85
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $174,825
- Expenses
- $165,363
- Assets
- $294,819
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- GREG LIVENGOOD (PRESIDENT)
- BRETT FERRY (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- GREG LIVENGOOD (PRESIDENT)
- BRETT FERRY (VICE PRESIDENT)
- CHAD BURLINGAME (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The primary objective of ross valley little league ("rvll") is to implant firmly in the children of the community the ideals of good sportmanship, honesty, loyalty, courage and respect for authority, so that they may be well adjusted, stronger and happier children and will grow to be good, decent, healthy and trustworthy citizens. To achieve this objective, rvll will provide a supervised program of baseball games and instruction under the rules and regulations of little league baseball, incorporated. All rvll directors, managers, officers, agents and other volunteers shall bear in mind that the attainment of exceptional athletic skill or the winning of games is secondary, and the molding of future citizens is of prime importance.
What it reported doing in 2021
To provide organized instructional and competitive baseball program for youth between ages 7 and 15.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 88% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 99% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 97
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 56
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 94.6%; rating input score 95
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 5.4%; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.78; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -0.3% per year; rating input score 0; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -5.4% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 3.1% per year; rating input score 100; 34th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 94.6% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $165K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 8 filing years from 2013 to 2021
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 38/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.