Roslyn Lacrosse Club Inc C/o Warren Hurwitz
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 270800870
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Roslyn, NY, USA
- Phone
- 5162382606
- Rating
- 69
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Racquet Sports
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $50,729
- Expenses
- $46,894
- Assets
- $36,253
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
1 person listed
People named in this filing
- warren hurwitz (director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The roslyn lacrosse club (the "RLC"), formed in 2009 to provide children in our community an opportunity to learn the game of lacrosse. The RLC is active promoting the sport in a fun, safe and positive manner to boys and girls. our mission is to develope the skills of young players through their participation in clinics and teams sponsored by the club.We are committed to providing any child who wants to play lacrosse the means and opportunity to do so. Our focus is on growing the number of participants, personal growth of the individual players, team performance and the accomplishments of our players on or off the field. while teaching the game of lacrosse to young athletes who wish to play completitively, we also promote the positive life lessons learned through participantion in team sports.
What it reported doing in 2025
To provide recreational lacrosse activities to the community
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 84
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 6
- Sustainability: 50
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 92.4%; rating input score 92
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: Limited
- Governance controls: 1 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 14
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 7.6%; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.77; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 24.2% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 19.1% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 19.9% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 92.4% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 1 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $47K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 1 people listed
- Consistency: 11 of 11 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2012 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 6 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 24/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 58/100.