Rosies Garage
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 260713408
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2011–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2021, Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- La Habra, CA, USA
- Phone
- 7146260655
- Rating
- 88
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Student Services, Organizations of Students
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $75,970
- Expenses
- $69,996
- Assets
- $394,146
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
People named in this filing
- ROSE M ESPINOZA (Executive Dir.)
- JOSE SANCHEZ (Treasurer)
- NATALI DE NIZ FIGUEROA (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of rosie's garage is to provide a safe place to reach and motivate at-risk and underprivileged children.
What it reported doing in 2024
Rosie's garage is dedicated to helping kids improve their school grade averages by improving their attitude towards school and themselves; by getting parents involved in their children's education and schools; and by building a sense of community and decreasing crime and gang activity in their local neighborhoods.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 85% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 95
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 60
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 92.4%; rating input score 92
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 7.9%; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.63; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 10.2% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 7.8% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 22.8% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 92.4% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $70K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2011 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 59/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.