Roseburg Concert Chorale Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
930923275
IRS 990 coverage
2024–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2023, Form 990-N 2017
Location
Idleyld Park, OR, USA
Phone
5414960748
Rating
66
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$241,383
Expenses
$241,415
Assets
$14,272
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Bobette Moyers (President)
  • Jack Holland (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Bobette Moyers (President)
  • Jack Holland (Vice President)
  • Tara Henry (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Our mission is to engage, inspire, and enrich the community and chorale participants through the performance of choral masterworks, diverse artistic experiences, and education outreach; to partner with schools throughout Douglas County; to bring the gift of music to Douglas County, Oregon, the nation, and the international community.

What it reported doing in 2024

Travel: In March 2023, we traveled to central Italy. We participated in masses in both Rome and Assisi, which was something new for most of the choir members. We performed Italian composerLuigi Cherubini's "Requiem", as well as several selections by American composers, for evening audiences in Rome and Florence. Each performance was an opportunity to share our love for music, and to help raise money for projects at each of the respective churches. At All Saints Anglican Church in Rome, proceeds were put toward the church's roof repairs. At St. James Episcopal Church in Florence, audience donations were used to assist with continuing organ repairs. The trip also included educational tours in Rome of the Vatican Museum, the Sistine Chapel, the Colosseum and Roman Forum, and the Gallery of the Academy of Florence, where Michelangelo's statue of David is housed. Coincidentally, there was a collection of musical instruments on display that was acquired by the Luigi Cherubini Conservatory in Florence. Some of the funds raised through donations and a baked potato booth at local festivals were used to assist two students at Umpqua Community College with cost of the trip. Without that help, neither would have been able the

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 93% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 88
  • Transparency & Controls: 81
  • Accountability: 6
  • Sustainability: 37
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 99.5%; rating input score 99
  • Program expense ratio: 99.5%; rating input score 99
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 90%; rating input score 90; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: Limited
  • Governance controls: 1 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 14
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -0%; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.06; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 50.5% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 9.1% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 99.5% of revenue deployed · 99.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 1 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $240K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 39 of 40 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 6 not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 39/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 4/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.