Rosebud Community Hospital Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
810405434
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Forsyth, MT, USA
Phone
4063462161
Rating
72
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Hospital, General

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$12,956,715
Expenses
$12,353,120
Assets
$7,213,421
Liabilities
$2,731,024

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

14 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MINDY PRICE (CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • MINDY PRICE (CEO): $192,451 total reported compensation
  • SHELLEY RICKETT (PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT): $175,119 total reported compensation
  • JEANNE MACIAG (DIRECTOR/DON): $157,369 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Employees of rhcc are committed to high quality, efficient and patient-centered care for our family, friends and community. In fulfillment of this mission, rosebud health care center: -will provide inpatient, outpatient and emergency services in addition to extended and respite care.-will promote the overall wellbeing of the area residents by working with area organizations and agencies to ensure that the public's needs are met in health related services and education programs.-recognize every individual's dignity and value regardless of age, sex, race, religion, national origin, disability, creed or social status.-will serve all individuals that seek care regardless of ability to pay.-will maintain a dedicated, professional staff through continuing education, in-service training, competitive wages and other means of recognition to promote growth and satisfaction with the staff.

What it reported doing in 2024

Rosebud health care center is a combined critical access hospital, long term care facility, and clinic providing quality health care, regardless of race, creed, sex, national origin, disability, age, or ability to pay. Although reimbursement for services rendered is critical to the operation of the hospital, it is recognized that not all individuals possess the ability to purchase essential medical services and further that our mission is to serve the community with respect to providing health care services and education. In keeping with the hospital's commitment to serve all members of the community, the following will be considered where the need and/or an individual's inability to pay coexists: free care and/or subsidized care (charity care) charges of $30,201.43 through june 30, 2025; care provided to persons covered by governmental programs at below cost; health activities and programs to support the community. These activities include wellness programs, community education programs, free health fairs, low cost lab health fairs, and a variety of broad community support activities. Rhcc provided 6,689 days of hospital/swing bed services, 5,002 days of nursing home care, and 5,961 rural health clinic visits during the year ended june 30, 2025.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 99% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 62
  • Transparency & Controls: 84
  • Accountability: 76
  • Sustainability: 38
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 68.7%; rating input score 69
  • Program expense ratio: 71.9%; rating input score 72
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Pass
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Pass
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 66.7%; rating input score 67; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Fail
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 4.7%; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.58; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.38; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 8.1%; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 2.7% per year; rating input score 100; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 5.2% per year; rating input score 100; 46th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 8% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 68.7% of revenue deployed · 71.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 6 of 9 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $8.9M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $192K · 14 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $1.5M reported
  • Consistency: 28 of 28 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 7 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 19/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 52/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Audit committee oversight not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 29/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 39/100.