Rose Housing Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 943242703
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2022
- Forms available
- Form 990 2022
- Location
- Portland, OR, USA
- Phone
- 5037888052
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Housing Development, Construction, Management
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $0
- Expenses
- $735,683
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ERIC JACKSON (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- AMANDA CLARK (DIRECTOR)
- MAC CUNNINGHAM (DIRECTOR)
- JAMILA DOZIER (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Operate a 25-unit low income apartment building in portland, Oregon.
What it reported doing in 2022
Marla manor is a 25-unit apartment building. During the year rose housing, inc. Ceased operations and transferred all assets and liabilities to marla manor, llc.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- No positive adjusted resources. The filing reports no positive adjusted operating resources.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 75
- Transparency & Controls: 93
- Accountability: 76
- Sustainability: 8
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 43
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: Limited
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 15.8% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 0.6% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 3% per year; rating input score 100; 58th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 10 of 10 board members independent · 3 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $736K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
- Consistency: 11 of 11 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes grants
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2010 to 2022
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 6 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.