Rose Hill Fall Festival Committee

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
320209696
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2021–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Rose Hill, KS, USA
Phone
3167769880
Rating
39
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$32,876
Expenses
$22,964
Assets
$30,071
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Natalie Greenlee (President)
  • Kelsey Lewis (Vice-President)

People named in this filing

  • Natalie Greenlee (President)
  • Kelsey Lewis (Vice-President)
  • Breanna Hottovy (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Organize town festival.

What it reported doing in 2025

The fall festival committee hosted the Rose Hill Fall Festival October 10-12, 2025. The chili feed fed over 345 people and included a chili cook-off and a lego display/judging contest. The parade had over 52 entries and the car show had over 120 entries. The craft fair filled every booth and the photo contest had multiple entries. The barbeque competition was a huge success (especially the people's choice award.) The family field events had lots of fun activities with long lines at the bouncy house and the face painting booth. The food court had more food trucks but there were lines all afternoon and the carnival had 10 rides and great weather. The pedal tractor pull and turtle races had lots of participants. The street dance included a live band and was the best yet. The fishing derby had to turn off registrations with 120 entries. There was lots of excitement with many fish caught and all prizes given away.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 73% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 68
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 30.1%; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.31; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -100% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 5.6% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 33% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2021 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 55/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.