Rose Andom Center Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
900990929
IRS 990 coverage
2016–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Denver, CO, USA
Phone
7203374475
Rating
81
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Spouse Abuse, Prevention

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$2,583,574
Expenses
$3,035,917
Assets
$9,930,991
Liabilities
$145,902

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

20 people listed

Highest reported compensation

  • WHITNEY WOODS (Executive Dir.): $116,777 total reported compensation
  • AMANDA BLEVINS (ADVANCEMENT DIRECT): $103,622 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The rose andom center strives to improve the lives of domestic violence victims by facilitating better access to services and staff of community organizations and governmental agencies in a single, safe location.

What it reported doing in 2025

At the rose andom center, community organizations and government agencies work together under one roof to provide for the needs of individuals and families affected by domestic violence. By co-locating staff and crucial services in one place, not only do these organizations and agencies provide more and better coordinated services, but victims and their families can access the full range of services and support they need in a single, safe location.the staff of partner organizations and agencies provide a wide array of services to victims of abuse. At the rose andom center, victims and their families can access domestic violence counseling, mental health services, crisis intervention, civil legal support, law enforcement services, job readiness and job search assistance, and information regarding the criminal justice system, among other critical services. At the rose andom center, victims can also receive referrals to additional community organizations for victims' other needs. Services are available to all victims regardless of their choice to report the abuse to the police. As a public-private collaboration, the rose andom center increases the likelihood that individuals and families will find the resources needed to achieve safety and stability in their lives. The rose andom center provides a warm, welcomingfacility that empowers victims to make the best decisions for their families. The rose andom center staff assists new clients with intakes, risk assessment, safety planning and connection to multiple resources.we assisted victims with emergency stays in hotels, providing grocery vouchers when they would not have access to food otherwise, and provided dozens of victims with cell phones to enable them to connect with other services.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 83% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 78
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Accountability: 91
  • Sustainability: 38
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 90.4%; rating input score 90
  • Program expense ratio: 76.5%; rating input score 77
  • Fundraising efficiency: $6.27 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 94.1%; rating input score 94; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 67.9%; rating input score 68; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -17.5%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.27; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 7.3%; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 18.3% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 11.8% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 1.3% per year; rating input score 100; 14th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 90.4% of revenue deployed · 76.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 18 of 18 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2.3M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $117K · 20 people listed
  • Consistency: 33 of 34 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
  • Filing history: 9 filing years from 2016 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 6 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 4 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 20/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 5/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 44/100.