Rosa Parks Charter High School
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 411948064
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2023
- Forms available
- Form 990 2023
- Location
- Rochester, MN, USA
- Phone
- 5072823325
- Rating
- 73
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Charter Schools
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,144,514
- Expenses
- $1,147,763
- Assets
- $557,850
- Liabilities
- $668,927
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- Jason Helm (Exective Director): $98,700 total reported compensation
- Blair Larson (Treasurer): $71,725 total reported compensation
- Adam Lopour (Board Chair): $63,619 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The primary objectives of the Rosa Parks Charter High School are to improve pupil learning, increase learning opportunities for pupils, establish new forms of accountability for schools, and measure learning outcomes via innovative measures.
What it reported doing in 2023
Rosa parks is a non-profit public high school for at-risk students, grades 9-12. Students attending have had issues in a regular public school, putting them 'at risk'. We have students that are at risk due to the following major factors, but not limited to these: years behind their graduation class, pregnant or parenting teen, in recovery from alcohol or other substance abuse, mental health issues, on probation or just general disciplinary issues. All students 'leave their baggage' at the door when they begin at Rosa Parks. Students work on academics, as well as learning respect for themselves and others.Rosa parks serves at risk students grades 9-12 as a public charter school in the state of Minnesota. In the past five years, our enrollment has varied from 58 to 125 students. Every year we have had between 25 and 30 students graduate with a high school diploma that most likely would have never finished school and become a drop out. We have served students from 16 to 23 different regular public-school districts in the past several years. Our ongoing goal is to give every student that comes to us with 'baggage' from their previous schools, a chance for a fresh start with Rosa Parks. Students are in a small classroom setting with 10-16 students per classroom. Each student is assigned to a specific homeroom and homeroom teachers. Here students have a chance to bond with other students and feel they are in a safe learning environment. The goal of Rosa Parks is not only to have students be successful at academics, but to also learn social skills that will make them good neighbors and citizens.Our program was reviewed by an independent group from Cambridge, England through the Minnesota department of education, and we received a favorable review on our complete program. We were told we should be a model for other schools dealing with the type of students we serve.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 93% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 70
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 77
- Sustainability: 26
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 78.5%; rating input score 79
- Program expense ratio: 78.2%; rating input score 78
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 60%; rating input score 60; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -0.3%; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.49; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.2; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 20.4%; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -2.1% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -0.8% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 3.3% per year; rating input score 100; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 78.5% of revenue deployed · 78.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 3 of 5 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $898K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $99K · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 31 of 31 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2010 to 2023
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 36/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 22/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 4/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 14/100.