Roosevelt Island Disabled Association Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
133251193
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2016–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2015
Location
Roosevelt Island, NY, USA
Phone
6463616469
Rating
93
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$107,775
Expenses
$100,998
Assets
$93,889
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • WENDY HERSH (PRESIDENT)
  • NANCY BROWN (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • BARBARA PARKER (CO-PRESIDENT)
  • BEN FHALA (ADVISOR TO PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • WENDY HERSH (PRESIDENT)
  • NANCY BROWN (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • MARY COLEMAN (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Rida's mission is to improve and enhance the quality of life of individuals with disabilities, mental, physical or emotional, living on roosevelt island, included but not limited to:1. Social services to help broaden knowledge of organizations and facilities that can assist individuals in daily living so that they can live a more independent and socially active life2. Cultural and social activities3. Transportation provided for disabled members

What it reported doing in 2024

Since the disabilities of our members are quite diverse, we try to provide activities and programs that are geared toward their strengths and abilities. We have also been assisting with food insecurity in our community since the beginning of pandemic by running a food pantry once a week.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 77% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 90
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 57
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 87.5%; rating input score 88
  • Program expense ratio: 93.4%; rating input score 93

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 6.3%; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.93; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 11.8% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 13.6% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 5.8% per year; rating input score 100; 48th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 87.5% of revenue deployed · 93.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $94K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 9 filing years from 2016 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 50/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 57/100.