Roosevelt High School Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 421239735
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Des Moines, IA, USA
- Phone
- 5156642020
- Rating
- 64
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Single Organization Support
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,808,265
- Expenses
- $326,832
- Assets
- $3,352,029
- Liabilities
- $591,620
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
21 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DAVE DYKSTRA (PRESIDENT)
- ZACH STUBBS (PRESIDENT-ELECT)
- NATE NIELSEN (PAST PRESIDENT)
- CHRIS DIEBEL (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- CHRIS DIEBEL (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $83,000 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The roosevelt high school foundation is organized to celebrate the tradition and shape the future of roosevelt high school by advancing and supporting the students, faculty, alumni, and roosevelt high school community.
What it reported doing in 2024
The roosevelt for generations capital campaign is a $3 million capital project to improve the facilities and student experience at roosevelt high school, in order to better serve an increasingly diverse student population and ensure excellence in 21st-century education. The campaign is focused on two projects - track and field, and library reimagined.track and field: this project included a renovated track and field. The current track and field was removed and replaced in the same location with state-of-the-art track surfacing and a synthetic turf field. The project updated fencing, added safer sidewalks, new signage, and landscaping beautification. This project is important to roosevelt formany reasons and the space will be a multipurpose community asset: it serves one of Iowa's largest marching bands, and is the practice field for a re-emerging football program, a storied track and field program, and a growing soccer program. During the school day, the track can be utilized by physical education classes for nearly 2,000 students. The field opened in spring of 2023 after construction finalized.library reimagined: this project will renovate the roosevelt library into a learning and innovation center: a "library reimagined" to support current and evolving needs in technology, communications, and development of 21st century skills. It will be a site for class work, small group projects, and independent research. The space has not had updates in 40 years, and needs amenities for multimodal learning and modern research needs. The learning and innovation center will be in the same location as the current library and will include reconfigured spaces including: flexible, collaborative learning spaces, docking stations for computers and research resources, and presentation spaces with updated technology. Traditional resources including books, periodicals, and school archives will also be preserved.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 97% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 94% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 39
- Transparency & Controls: 84
- Accountability: 74
- Sustainability: 78
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 13.6%; rating input score 14
- Program expense ratio: 59.9%; rating input score 60
- Fundraising efficiency: $11,571.03 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 86.7%; rating input score 87; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 92%; rating input score 92; 39th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 38
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 81.9%; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 10.26; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.18; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 25.4%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 14.4% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 16.9% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 10.7% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 13.6% of revenue deployed · 59.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 20 of 20 board members independent · 3 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $196K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $83K · 21 people listed
- Consistency: 27 of 29 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2011 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 14/100.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 7 not reported.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 10/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 33/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.