Ronald Mcdonald House of Danville Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
232155803
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Danville, PA, USA
Phone
5702716300
Rating
80
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Cancer

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,303,012
Expenses
$917,533
Assets
$7,912,203
Liabilities
$8,795

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

18 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JODI BATMAN (PRESIDENT (AS OF 01/2026))
  • MIKE TURLIS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • MIKE TURLIS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $94,417 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission of the ronald mcdonald house of danville, inc. Is to provide temporary, convenient, compassionate and subsidized housing, and other assistance, for pediatric oncology and other patients and their families during periods of treatment at area hospitals.

What it reported doing in 2025

Camp dostthe ronald mcdonald house of danville is the proud sponsor of camp dost. Camp dost is held at camp victory, a special needs camping facility, located in millville, pa. The program was conceived to give pediatric cancer patients the opportunity to enjoy a summer camp experience without worrying about medical care. Perhaps more important to children, there are no worries about "fitting in." at camp dost, they have more in common with their peers than any place else.the camp experience has always proved to be a rich and rewarding one that leads to fond memories and unexpected life lessons. In the nurturing environment of camp dost, campers realize a new-found independence through personal growth. They learn to compromise, appreciate teamwork, and become a self-advocate. Most importantly, they come to understand that they are not alone in their battle with cancer. Camp dost provides a system of support like no other. It begins with the fact that each patient is permitted to invite one sibling to attend camp, add to that the volunteer counselors, many of whom are former campers themselves, and a medical staff of familiar faces. Either by personal or professional experience, all camp dost staff know the road our campers travel in dealing with cancer.camp dost offers the excitement of an array of activities: rope climbing, swimming, arts & crafts, music, biking, fishing, etc. What makes it different from most summer camps is a fully staffed facility known as the "med shed." centrally located on the campgrounds, the med shed is staffed by a pediatric oncology physician or certified registered nurse practitioner and a certified pediatric oncology nurse. An added resource is the many professionals who serve as volunteer counselors: pediatric physicians, pediatric psychologists, child life specialists, social workers, and others.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 70% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 60
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 77
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 66.6%; rating input score 67
  • Program expense ratio: 65.3%; rating input score 65
  • Fundraising efficiency: $3.59 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 29.6%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 8.62; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 10.3%; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 1% per year; rating input score 100; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 5.3% per year; rating input score 100; 39th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 5.2% per year; rating input score 100; 36th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 66.6% of revenue deployed · 65.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 15 of 15 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $599K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $94K · 18 people listed
  • Consistency: 33 of 33 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2010 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 10/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 37/100.