Ronald Mcdonald House Charities of the Piedmont Triad Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 581454715
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Winston Salem, NC, USA
- Phone
- 3367230228
- Rating
- 74
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Patient Services - Entertainment, Recreation
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $3,651,888
- Expenses
- $2,860,492
- Assets
- $19,482,763
- Liabilities
- $124,589
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
24 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JASMINE PITT (PRESIDENT-EL)
- EMILY SMITH (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- CHARLES W KRAFT (CHIEF EXEC O): $155,092 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Ronald mcdonald house charities of the piedmont triad, inc's mission is to provide essential services that remove barriers, strengthen families, and promote healing when children need healthcare.
What it reported doing in 2025
Ronald mcdonald house charities of the piedmont triad, inc. (rmhcpt) owns and operates a 36-bedroom facility that provides temporary lodging for families of seriously ill children who must leave their home community to seek medical care for their children in our community. For most of the families we serve, their children are patients at advocate health atrium health wake forest baptist levine children's brenner children's hospital or novant health forsyth medical center. However, any medical facility in our community (service area) may refer families caring for pediatric patients. More than a place to stay, our ronald mcdonald house offers our guest families comfortable bedrooms, home-cooked meals, laundry facilities, free parking, areas for recreation and the support of professional staff and other guests in similar circumstances. In 2025, our house provided 7,940 family nights serving 1,137 families from 67 North Carolina counties, and 12 other states, and 1 other country. Families are asked for a donation of 10.00 for each night they stay with us. No one is turned away due to an inability to pay and approximately 94% of our families are unable to donate any amount. The difference between the cost to operate each room and the amount paid by our families is funded by community donations. Civic groups, churches and individuals contribute to provide funding for our house. In-kind goods and services valued in excess of 179,300 enhance the services provided to our families and reduce the amount of financial donations spent on programs, administrative and fundraising costs. Some examples of our in-kind gifts include: laundry, yard work and landscaping services, 403 meals prepared by volunteers or provided by local resturants as donations or purchased with donated funds, snack foods, drinks, household and paper goods. We enjoyed having 45 volunteers providing 1,925 hours to support staff and families in our house on a regular basis by assisting in meal preparation, guest family relations, office and housekeeping duties. In addition, 2,398 one-time volunteers serving 5,581 hours, were involved in promoting the house and implementing the house's annual service & fundraising events: house and grounds cleaning, sport-a-shirt/share-a- night, dbmc golf tournament, wine women & shoes, character breakfast and luminary kit sales.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 67% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and most voting board members are independent. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 63
- Transparency & Controls: 65
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 76
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 65.8%; rating input score 66
- Program expense ratio: 72.7%; rating input score 73
- Fundraising efficiency: $5.03 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 21.7%; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 6.81; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 5.4%; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 8.1% per year; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 8.4% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 3.6% per year; rating input score 100; 25th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 65.8% of revenue deployed · 72.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 23 of 23 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $2.1M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $155K · 24 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 39 of 39 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 15/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 54/100.