Ronald McDonald House Charities of the Philadelphia Region
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 237377505
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Phone
- 215-387-8406
- Rating
- 66
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $30,645,793
- Expenses
- $11,935,493
- Assets
- $60,682,800
- Liabilities
- $5,689,915
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
35 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ROBERT BIGLIN (CO-PRESIDENT)
- CINDY KEAVENEY (VICE PRESIDENT)
- DONNA PILLA-ABBONIZIO (VICE PRESIDENT)
- MICHAEL KELLY (CO-PRESIDENT)
- SUSAN CAMPBELL (CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- SUSAN CAMPBELL (CEO): $264,972 total reported compensation
- CHRIS CALLANAN (CHIEF DEVELOPMENT OFFICER): $159,659 total reported compensation
- THOMAS SERVELLO - CHIEF (MARKETING AND COMMUNICATIONS OFFICER): $147,778 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To create, find and support programs that directly improve the health and well-being of children and their families.
What it reported doing in 2024
Ronald mcdonald camp (rmc) enables children with cancer and their siblings to experience the joys of summer camp. Created by rmh co-founder dr. Audrey e. Evans in 1986, this one-week camp was one of the very first of its kind to offer a camp experience specifically designed for children with cancer and their siblings. Rmc, held annually in the pocono mountains of Pennsylvania, includes all of the activities found at a traditional overnight summer camp, such as swimming, sailing, hiking, sports, arts and crafts, yoga, and rope courses, except that, at this camp, campers can participate no matter what limitations they have. For many campers, the week at camp is the first time they have ever tried the activities offered, and they go home not only having discovered a new talent or learned a new skill, but having gained a sense of self-confidence. For children who have felt isolated from their peers through their illness, and siblings who have felt left out, camp is also an opportunity to join a family of campers who can relate to one another, and to develop a wide-reaching support network that will last long after the week of camp is over.children ages 7 to 17 (including current or former cancer patients and one sibling) are welcome at camp and are divided by age into junior and senior camps. More than 100 fully-trained volunteer counselors (many of whom are cancer survivors and past campers) and a full team of over a dozen medical staff, including pediatric oncologists, nurses and social workers from chop, volunteer their time over the summer to make camp possible. In 2024, rmhc-phi hosted one week of rmc for children with cancer and their siblings with primary goals of keeping campers safe and providing an inclusive community of fun where campers can experience engaging activities like any other kid, and one weekend for the pilot year of family camp, an opportunity for families with a child recenly off cancer treatment to connect with each other, other families, and enjoy camp activities together. In august, 152 campers and seven participants in a young adult leadership program returned to in person camp programming for a week at a campground in the pocono mountains. Building off the three years of successful return to camp post-covid, rmhc-phi coordinated with healthcare partners to ensure another safe return to in person activities. 126 volunteers took part as counselors, activity specialists, and medical team members to make these weeks of camp possible. Campers enjoyed the return of the beloved friday whole-camp activity (this year on theme of fantasy faire) and being able to chose their afternoon activities best suited to their interests. 2024 also brought the launch of the pilot year of the ronald mcdonald family camp, a friday to sunday experience for families who have a child 1-5 years off of their cancer treatment. The family camp was run in coordination with social workers from the ronald mcdonald house philadelphia and rmc camp staff. 7 families (26 people) experienced a community of peers who understand what they are going through, opportunity to reflect on "gratitude" in their lives, and enjoy the incredible bonding from shared activities such as lake, boating, adventure course, field trips, arts and crafts and more! While there is no charge to the patient campers, siblings traditionally can attend for a nominal fee of $150. In 2024, sibling fees totaled $7,525. Funding for the week is provided solely through the contributions of individuals and organizations. Ronald mcdonald camp is accredited through the american camp association (aca) and is a member of the children's oncology camping association, international (coca). Ronald mcdonald camp, when held in-person, is held at the camp timber tops facility in greeley, Pennsylvania and ronald mcdonald family camp is held at camp oneka in tafton, Pennsylvania.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 62% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 92% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - Most voting board members are independent and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 45
- Transparency & Controls: 63
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 82
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 30.8%; rating input score 31
- Program expense ratio: 77.4%; rating input score 77
- Fundraising efficiency: $5.65 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 94.4%; rating input score 94; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Scored; rating input score 0
- Grant itemization coverage: 62.7%; rating input score 63; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 61.1%; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.08; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.09; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 8.4%; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 6.4% per year; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 8.3% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 7.5% per year; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 6 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 30.8% of revenue deployed · 77.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 24 of 24 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $9.2M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $265K · 35 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $873K reported
- Consistency: 37 of 38 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 10 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, grants, executive pay, and related organizations
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2012 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 8 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 4 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 31/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 23/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 27/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.