Ronald Mcdonald House Charities of Northeast Ohio Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
341269123
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Cleveland, OH, USA
Phone
2162295757
Rating
77
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Patient Services - Entertainment, Recreation

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$9,305,338
Expenses
$8,358,862
Assets
$40,747,025
Liabilities
$554,921

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

36 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • NOVAK MICHAEL (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • BENNETT TREY (PRESIDENT)
  • WILSON CRAIG G (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)

Highest reported compensation

  • WILSON CRAIG G (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER): $244,582 total reported compensation
  • HUBBARD JUDY (CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER): $174,078 total reported compensation
  • TZOULOUFIS ARISTEA (CHIEF DEVELOPMENT OFFICER): $154,277 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission of ronald mcdonald house charities of northeast Ohio, inc. Is to provide essential services that remove barriers, strengthen families, and promote healing when children need healthcare.

What it reported doing in 2024

Our ronald mcdonald house programs in cleveland and akron provided 1,374 families with a comforting place to stay during their child's medical journey, totaling 25,185 nights of rest. These families traveled from 12 countries, 43 u.s. States, and 69 Ohio counties, knowing they would be met with compassion, dignity, and the comforts of home. At full capacity, rmhc neo can welcome 95 families each night between the akron and cleveland houses. Families from Ohio made up 68% of guests, with the top counties served including mahoning, trumbull, stark, columbiana, wayne, summit, cuyahoga, and lorain. Out-of-state and international families comprised the remaining 32%. No family is ever charged to stay. While it costs approximately $150 per night to provide this care, our donors cover the cost ensuring that finances never stand in the way of healing.in total, rmhc neo served 96,307 meals across all program sites, saving families more than $1.45 million in food costs during their child's healthcare journey.- at the houses: 50,456 meals were served in cleveland and 21,301 in akron, along with 24/7 access to grab-and-go snacks, beverages, and pantry staples.- beyond the house: 20,485 meals were served in family rooms and 7,545 meals were delivered to akron children's and mercy health locations in the mahoning valley.each meal provided is a tangible expression of our value of compassion nourishing families so they can be fully present for their child.volunteers are the heart of rmhc neo. In 2024, 435 individual volunteers contributed more than 29,000 hours of service valued at over $984,000. From greeting guests to preparing meals and offering pet therapy visits (70 in total), our volunteers exemplify commitment and respect in every interaction. Their presence fosters a community of care that is priceless to the families we serve. Our annual volunteer celebration was held at the beautiful stan hywett hall and gardens, honoring milestones and recognizing extraordinary service across all programs.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 79% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 67
  • Transparency & Controls: 74
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 67
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 70.2%; rating input score 70
  • Program expense ratio: 75.8%; rating input score 76
  • Fundraising efficiency: $6.29 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 10.2%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.87; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 11.8%; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 10.8% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 7.8% per year; rating input score 100; 58th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 6.7% per year; rating input score 100; 43rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 70.2% of revenue deployed · 75.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 30 of 30 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 6 filed program accomplishments · $6.3M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $245K · 36 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $1.2M reported
  • Consistency: 36 of 36 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 6 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 23/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 25/100.