Ronald Mcdonald House Charities of Mississippi Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
630906927
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Jackson, MS, USA
Phone
6019815683
Rating
85
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Patient Services - Entertainment, Recreation

Reported finances

Revenue
$555,972
Expenses
$731,005
Assets
$3,317,562
Liabilities
$23,797

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

20 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • LAURA TAYLOR (PRESIDENT)
  • RUTH ANN ALLEN (FORMER EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • JANE HARKINS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • RUTH ANN ALLEN (FORMER EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $103,776 total reported compensation
  • JANE HARKINS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $39,816 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The purpose of this corporation is to provide essential services that remove barriers, strenghten families, and promote healing when children need healthcare.

What it reported doing in 2025

During 2025 ronald mcdonald house charities of Mississippi, inc. Cared for families with children who are ill or injured through our corner-stone program ronald mcdonald house. Ronald mcdonald house provided temporary, home-away-from-home lodging for families who have children receiving specialized medical treatment. Our facility includes 16 private bedrooms with private baths; 4 kitchens; 2 laundry rooms; living room; television areas; play room; patio and courtyard. Most families are within walking distance of their hospitalized child. Along with lodging facilities, items such as food, parking, personal care items and laundry supplies are available to all families free of charge.the ronald mcdonald house operates 24 hours per day, 365 days per year. Staff members, individual volunteers and groups assist with caring for the families and the facility. They provide a caring face and listening ear to the numerous families who are traumatized by the life-threatening illness of their child. Through various activities (both in-person and off-sight) over 500 volunteers gave of their time.we are fortunate and very grateful for in-kind gifts and services totaling $76,824 which aided tremendously in our providing the aforementioned services.we were honored to care for three hundred fifty-six (356) families within ronald mcdonald house during 2025. The average length of stay was 15 nights. Families primarily came from the state of Mississippi with several claiming residency in surrounding states. Guest families donated an average of twenty-six cents ($0.26) per room, per night for the year. Thus, individual, service group, and corporate donations are vital to caring for these families and children.in order to shorten the time patients were inside hospitals, we saw an increase in families staying at ronald mcdonald house the night before surgical procedures. Thus, families and children were able to relax the night before going to the hospital and didn't have to experience a long and early travel time prior to surgery. No matter the circumstance, the greatest things families receive while at ronald mcdonald house are the concern of others and the friendship of families going through the same thing - the devastation of having a critically-ill child.adding televisions to each family room highlighted improvements for 2025. These upgrades help maintain a comfortable atmosphere for all of our guests.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 82% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 90
  • Transparency & Controls: 87
  • Accountability: 90
  • Sustainability: 36
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 82.4%; rating input score 82
  • Fundraising efficiency: $33.54 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 93.8%; rating input score 94; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -31.5%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.54; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 19.6%; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 2.1% per year; rating input score 100; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -1.1% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 1.7% per year; rating input score 100; 21st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 82.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 18 of 18 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $602K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $104K · 20 people listed
  • Consistency: 28 of 29 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2010 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 4/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 8 not reported.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 17/100.