Rolling in Faith

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
844582302
IRS 990 coverage
2024–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2023
Location
Metropolis, IL, USA
Phone
6186850453
Rating
71
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Recreation& Sports N.E.C.

Reported finances

Revenue
$204,602
Expenses
$142,677
Assets
$247,833
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Hadley Stephes (Executive Director)
  • Allen Rice (President)

Highest reported compensation

  • Hadley Stephes (Executive Director): $43,952 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission of Rolling in Faith is to cultivate belonging, empowering people with disabilities to flourish within their communities, resulting in a body of co-laborers who are seen, known, and loved.

What it reported doing in 2025

Holland House: Holland House by Rolling in Faith is a faith-based day program that aims to create a safe space for adults with intellectual disabilities in the four-river region to maintain the skills necessary to thrive as independently and successfully as possible. Holland House will provide opportunities for education that empowers and inspires its participants. Allowing our participants to grow spiritually/emotionally, educationally, and interpersonally. These experiences allow our participants to forge a path in the community that is individualized to their specific needs and interests, showing our community the value that people with disabilities bring to all areas of our society. Placemaker Parties: Are free respite events for the whole family to come and interact with others who can relate to their life experiences. Creating an environment that promotes community and engagement. Summer Skills: Summer Skills is a special offshoot of our Holland House program that teenagers who are still in the school cane become familiar with a day program setting with the hope that they will join Holland House in the future as they age out of their respective schools. While allowing our our year-round participants an opportunity to take a break from their school-like program and focus more on building relationships and learning about their community. Summer Skills focuses on socioemotional skills of our participants, adults and teens. Social and emotional development skills are essential for people with disabilities and special needs to be able to effectively and safely navigate the world around them. A world that is oftentimes, not created with their needs in mind. We give our participants the opportunity to engage in on campus learning that requires them to collaborate and engage with others while learning how to express themselves and engage in a group setting. We also place a huge emphasis on community service and visibility. For communities to be truly inclusive we as advocates must be willing to be the bridge between our friends with special needs and our communities. We do this through recreational and educational outings and community service projects. We also invite various providers and community members to join us on campus for specific programming.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 62% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and some filed totals do not add up.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 70
  • Transparency & Controls: 80
  • Accountability: 55
  • Sustainability: 65
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 67.8%; rating input score 68
  • Program expense ratio: 95.8%; rating input score 96
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 88.9%; rating input score 89; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 85.7%; rating input score 86; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 1 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 12
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Fail
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 30.3%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.74; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 30.8%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 3.9% per year; rating input score 100; 46th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 48.4% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 48.4% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 67.8% of revenue deployed · 95.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 6 of 7 board members independent · 1 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $137K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $44K · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 21 of 22 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 7 of 8 not reported.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 56/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 10/100.