Rolling Green Village
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 570647976
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Aug 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
- Location
- Greenville, SC, USA
- Phone
- 864-987-4612
- Rating
- 78
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $29,139,579
- Expenses
- $29,937,416
- Assets
- $87,320,976
- Liabilities
- $93,658,952
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
20 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- TOERNER RYAN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- SHYMSKE LEGARE (DIR. OF NURSING): $144,268 total reported compensation
- RUTH WOOD (MARKETING DIRECTOR): $142,665 total reported compensation
- VOGELSBERG BRUCE (DIR. FOOD/BEVERAGE): $133,880 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide high-quality living and care for seniors in a maintenance-free and fun-filled community.
What it reported doing in 2024
The licensed areas include 24 hour care including assistance with bathing, dressing, medication administration, three well balanced meals each day with accomodations for special diets when prescribed by a physician. There is also weekly housekeeping with daily tidying of room, laundry and personal laundry services, emergency call system to licensed nurse available 24-hours, a 7 day/week full activities program, utilities including electricity, gas, water, sewer, and extended basic cable television. (continued on schedule o)many other services are also available at an additional charge such as beauty and barber, escorts to physician appointments, personal and medical supplies, (1) day and extended off campus trips, and guest meals. Many additional non chargeable activities exist for all residents such as water aerobics, exercise classes, board games, and entertainment from outside vendors.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 96% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. Expenses are high relative to revenue and liabilities are high compared with assets.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 57
- Transparency & Controls: 94
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 41
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 64.3%; rating input score 64
- Program expense ratio: 63.7%; rating input score 64
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -2.7%; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.92; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.07; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 2.6%; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 4.9% per year; rating input score 100; 41st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 6.6% per year; rating input score 100; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 12.7% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 3 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 64.3% of revenue deployed · 63.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 13 of 13 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $19.1M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $144K · 20 people listed
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $5.1M reported
- Consistency: 37 of 37 current checks pass
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 6 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 21/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 5/100.