Roja Futbol Club Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
834699915
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2019–2022
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2022
Location
Papillion, NE, USA
Phone
4026503227
Rating
85
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Soccer

Reported finances

Revenue
$5,319
Expenses
$115,216
Assets
$21,989
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ASHLEY BRUNT (PRESIDENT)
  • PATRICK HODGES (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • MARC BRUNT (DIRECTOR THRU 04/22)
  • RACHEL THOMPSON (DIRECTOR)
  • ASHLEY BRUNT (PRESIDENT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Roja has created an environment conducive to the development of the whole player through quality training, study, competition and cultural growth. Our focus is to deliver a positive environment for every girl to participate, enjoy, achieve success and be creative without the fear of making a mistake. We strive to give all girls the opportunity to play competitive soccer, and financial hardship will never prohibit a player from playing for roja futbol club.

What it reported doing in 2022

The corporation seeks to promote an interest in soccer among young athletes by sponsoring, organizing, and operating developmental soccer programs for children located in omaha, Nebraska, and surrounding areas. In promoting an interest in soccer among young athletes, the corporation's mission is to develop children's skills in the areas of teamwork, responsibility, hard work, sportsmanship, and friendship. There are 274 girls in the club.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 98% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 99
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 14
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 97%; rating input score 97

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -2,066.1%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.19; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 17.4%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 10.6% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -54% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -33.4% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 97% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $112K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2019 to 2022
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 2/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 14/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 9/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.