ROHI Alternative Community Outreach Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
770450334
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2009
Forms available
Form 990 2009
Location
San Jose, CA, USA
Phone
4089262926
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Neighborhood Centers

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$230,803
Expenses
$234,665
Assets
$141,995
Liabilities
$108,883

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2009. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2009. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Specific purpose of the organization:1. Relief of the poor, distressed, or the underprivileged2. Advancement of religion3. Advancement of education4. Lessening the burders of government and of neighboring tensions5. Elmination of prejudice and discrimination; defense of human and civil rights secured by law6. Combatting community deterioration and juvenile delinquency7. Counseling, mentoring, and training individuals of all ages and ethicities, especially minorities and youth.8. Erecting and maintaining public building, monuments, or works for use or program particpants that support the above program goals.9. The articles of incorporation and bylaws shall not be inconsistent with the law.

What it reported doing in 2009

Midnight Basketball League - An outreach program designed to use basketball as a tool to draw in at risk, inner-city teens from San Jose, California and provide them with an alternative to the drugs, alcohol, violence, gangs and social pressures that encompass inner-city life. Through the Organization's winter and summer leagues, it is able to mentor and develop young people into socially responsible leaders of tomorrow. The young adults of the program are able to learn through workshops, coaches, mentors as well as other players that they can overcome obstacles and realize their full potential.

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 96% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 86
  • Accountability: 16
  • Sustainability: 32
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 3 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 38
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Fail
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -1.7%; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.61; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.77; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 38.1%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: 0 of 9 board members independent · 3 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $185K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $89K · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 18 of 19 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 8 not reported.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 47/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 24/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 9/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 16/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.
  • High — Grant Readiness: California registration: this organization is not authorized to operate as a charity in California.