Rogue Community Health
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 237366812
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2013–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Medford, Oregon, US
- Phone
- (541) 773-3863
- Rating
- 73
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Health Treatment Facilities, Primarily Outpatient
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $42,555,064
- Expenses
- $44,013,054
- Assets
- $28,618,242
- Liabilities
- $13,700,191
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
26 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DOUG MCKENZIE (PAST-PRESIDENT)
- NANCY NORDYKE (PRESIDENT)
- MARY COOMBS (PRESIDENT ELECT)
Highest reported compensation
- DANIEL WEINER (MEDICAL OFFICER): $376,486 total reported compensation
- WILLIAM NORTH (EXECUTIVE OFFICER): $344,113 total reported compensation
- STACEY J PORTERFIELD (PHYSICIAN): $328,930 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Vibrant health for all, especially the most vulnerable, in partnership with our community.
What it reported doing in 2024
Rogue community health fulfills its mission by providing core services that consist of a sliding-fee-schedule, patient-centered primary, preventative, and prenatal health care, and by offering such complementary services such as integrated behavioral health care, preventative dental services, and prescription medication assistance. The services of rogue community health are made available at practice locations in ashland, medford, white city, prospect, butte falls, and through school and community based activity sites. Services are provided for all individuals and families with a focus on care for vulnerable persons who live at or below 200% of the federal poverty level who are uninsured and underinsured, and to persons who experience geographic, linguistic, and cultural barriers to care. Rogue community health is uniquely situated to leverage a wide array of community resources, and annually receives donated medical laboratory and radiologic services from the community's two largest hospitals, as well as in-kind and voluntary services of 250 community physicians who practice in medical specialty areas and agree to accept the agency's referrals at no direct cost to the patient. In the current year, 14,477 individuals benefited from 58,462 face-to-face visits.other programs include patient outreach which had total
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 87% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and most voting board members are independent. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 68
- Transparency & Controls: 66
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 23
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 74.4%; rating input score 74
- Program expense ratio: 71.9%; rating input score 72
- Fundraising efficiency: $6.29 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -3.4%; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.65; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.48; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 7.9%; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 15.1% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 14.3% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 14.4% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 3 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 6 operating locations identified
- Where the money goes: 74.4% of revenue deployed · 71.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 13 of 13 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $31.7M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $376K · 26 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $155K reported
- Consistency: 33 of 33 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes executive pay
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2013 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 12 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 26/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 20/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 22/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 30/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 30/100.