Rogers Dugout Booster Club

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
300964831
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2017–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Rogers, MN, USA
Phone
9522391120
Rating
76
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Baseball, Softball

Reported finances

Revenue
$99,557
Expenses
$82,381
Assets
$104,556
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JOSEY DOOLEY (PRESIDENT)
  • KARIN RIDLEHOOVER (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • JOSEY DOOLEY (PRESIDENT)
  • KARIN RIDLEHOOVER (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • DAN ALLARD (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The rogers dugout booster club mission is to produce an environment that inspires student athletes, coaches, parents and the community to collectively create a positive and spirited atmosphere for our baseball program. Our desire is to build a strong moral character and academic excellence in the student athletes while seeking to raise funds for the rogers high school baseball program, as we streghten the status of our program, to support the financial need of our student athletes.

What it reported doing in 2025

Rogers dugout booster club provides services of maintaining local baseball fields and supports local amateur baseball players.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 82% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 99% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Revenue has declined or grown slowly and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 74
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 63
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 69.1%; rating input score 69
  • Program expense ratio: 83.2%; rating input score 83

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 17.3%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.27; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 2.1% per year; rating input score 100; 54th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -0.3% per year; rating input score 0; 49th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 14% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 69.1% of revenue deployed · 83.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $69K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 9 filing years from 2017 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 54/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.