Rocky Point Athlectic Booster Club

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
465517214
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2014–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Rocky Point, NY, USA
Phone
6318483760
Rating
86
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Community Service Clubs

Reported finances

Revenue
$86,447
Expenses
$73,129
Assets
$104,839

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ANDREW WEISMAN (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • ANDREW WEISMAN (PRESIDENT)
  • ERNEST DANTUNONO (TREASURER)
  • BRIAN WEINFELD (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Form 990-ez, part iii- primary exempt purpose the primary focus of the club is to provide for the advancement of the rocky point union free school district physical education and athletic programs and to encourage the participation in competition and events. The club will also encourage sportsmanship, social participation and etiquette among participants, members and families.

What it reported doing in 2024

First accomplishmnet: the purpose of the club include raising funds and purchasing personal property and services to be used by students and faculty in the rocky point school district, providing volunteers for education and extra-curricular activities, engaging in other charitable, civic or education activiites that will contribute to the public education of the community.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 91
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 55
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 84.6%; rating input score 85
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 15.4%; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.43; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 9.7% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 11.9% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 16.8% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 84.6% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $73K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 8 filing years from 2014 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 56/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.