Rocky Mountain Section of the Pga
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 942490511
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2019–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Star, ID, USA
- Phone
- 2089396028
- Rating confidence
- Limited
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $865,976
- Expenses
- $863,206
- Assets
- $940,973
- Liabilities
- $207,738
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- EDDIE KAVRAN (PRESIDENT)
- NICKLAUS BLASIUS (VICE-PRESIDENT)
- ZACH ABELS (SNAKE RIVER CHAPTER PRESIDENT)
- DOUG HAGEN (YELLOWSTONE CHAPTER PRESIDENT)
- VAUGHN JENKINS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- VAUGHN JENKINS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $150,409 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To promote the enjoyment & involvement in the game of golf and to contribute to the growth of the golf professional and the golf industry. The rocky mountain section will accomplish this mission by enhancing the skills of the golf professionals and promoting the opportunities for amateurs, manufacturers, and the general public. As a result, the rocky mountain section will elevate the standards of the professional golfers vocation, stimulate interest in the game of golf, and promote the overall vitality of the game.
What it reported doing in 2024
Education: golf professionals are the foundation of golf. The professionals are expert instructors and community leaders who help provide affordable and accessible golf to everyone, everywhere with the rocky mountain section. Rocky mountain section provides educational programs to ensure that golf professionals will remain at the forefront of the game-providing enjoyment to many, for generations to come.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 92% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 77
- Accountability: 74
- Sustainability: 36
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 38
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 0.3%; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.09; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.22; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 17.4%; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 5.9% per year; rating input score 100; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 12% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: 10 of 10 board members independent · 3 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments
- Leadership: top reported pay $150K · 11 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 11 of 11 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes executive pay
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2019 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 7 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 37/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 45/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 18/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 30/100.