Rocky Mountain Planned Parenthood Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
840404253
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Denver, CO, USA
Phone
3033217526
Rating
78
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Standard
Sector
Family Planning Centers

Reported finances

Revenue
$61,957,279
Expenses
$64,135,596
Assets
$79,328,712
Liabilities
$14,782,087

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

33 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ADRIENNE MANSANARES (PRESIDENT AND CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • ADRIENNE MANSANARES (PRESIDENT AND CEO): $492,868 total reported compensation
  • KRISTINA TOCCE (CMO): $366,935 total reported compensation
  • SABRINA HOLMQUIST (DEPUTY MEDICAL DIRECTOR): $318,590 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Planned parenthood of the rocky mountains, which includes health centers in Colorado, southern Nevada, and New Mexico, has been helping individuals make responsible choices for over 104 years.pprm empowers individuals and families in the communities we serve to make informed choices about their sexual and reproductive health by providing high quality health services, comprehensive sex education and strategic advocacy.it is the vision of pprm to lead our region's efforts and be the strongest voice to ensure an individual's right and ability to access reproductive and sexual health care in changing financial and political climates. With increased philanthropy and innovation, pprm is committed to meeting our region's needs.pprm is a leader in advancing and providing comprehensive, medically accurate, and age-appropriate sex education. Pprm offers both long- and short-term programs designed specifically for youth as well as education for adult learners.

What it reported doing in 2024

In fiscal year 2025, planned parenthood of the rocky mountains served 47,442 patients across our three state region Colorado, New Mexico, and Wyoming. Our 21 health centers provided 66,372 visits, delivering high quality, patient centered sexual and reproductive health care during a year of continued national challenges to abortion access and gender affirming care. As bans and restrictions intensified across the country, 3,590 patients traveled from out of state to receive essential care at our Colorado and New Mexico clinics.the majority of our patients sought family planning and preventive health services, including contraception, wellness exams, cancer screenings, and sti testing and treatment. In fy25, pprm provided 55,054 birth control methods, 137,416 sti tests, 2,708 wellness exams, 994 pap tests, 5,730 longacting reversible contraceptives, and 13,297 abortion procedures. Telehealth remained a critical access point, with 4,025 virtual visits, including 1,599 telehealth medication abortions and hundreds of gender affirming care appointments.nearly half of our health centers are located in federally designated health professional shortage areas and medically underserved areas, and pprm is recognized as an essential community provider. Our patients are primarily single adults ages 19-32, multiracial, black or african american, or white, english or spanish speaking, and living at or below 100% of the federal poverty level. Over 75% of our patients are uninsured or have medicaid coverage. Many face significant financial barriers, and pprm continues to ensure affordability through accessible fee structures, more than $1 million in service discounts, and $131,900 in direct financial support to over 2,000 patients to help cover transportation, lodging, childcare, and other costs.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 98% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 67
  • Transparency & Controls: 86
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 31
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 72.8%; rating input score 73
  • Program expense ratio: 66.8%; rating input score 67
  • Fundraising efficiency: $9.89 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 94.7%; rating input score 95; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 98.3%; rating input score 98; 35th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -3.5%; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.24; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.19; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 5.2%; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 4.4% per year; rating input score 100; 35th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 6% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 6.2% per year; rating input score 100; 46th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 72.8% of revenue deployed · 66.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 18 of 18 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $42.8M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $493K · 33 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $1.8M reported
  • Consistency: 42 of 43 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 10 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, executive pay, and related organizations
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 16 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 10 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 41/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 15/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 47/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 16/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.