Rocky Mountain Peace & Justice Center

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
742302470
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2009–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2020, Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Boulder, CO, USA
Rating
88
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
International Peace and Security

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$161,660
Expenses
$177,339
Assets
$345,440
Liabilities
$3,083

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • BETTY BALL (President)

People named in this filing

  • BETTY BALL (President)
  • JUDITH MOHLING (BOARD MEMBER)
  • JIM NELSON (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Rooted in the spirit of unconditional nonviolence, the rocky mountain peace and justice center is dedicated to progressive personal and social change. As a multi issue organization, we work to restore and protect the earth and human rights. We educate, organize, act and build community in order to create a culture of justice and peace.

What it reported doing in 2024

General Events: RMPJC's general events are oriented toward a key part of our mission which is to build community and nurture a culture of justice and peace. This includes hosting public events that bring the community together such as film screenings, art events, tabling at farmers markets, picnics, and educational events.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 82
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 36
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 84.9%; rating input score 85
  • Program expense ratio: 77.4%; rating input score 77

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -9.7%; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.95; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 56.9%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 3.3% per year; rating input score 100; 41st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 3.8% per year; rating input score 100; 41st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 10.7% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 84.9% of revenue deployed · 77.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $137K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 8 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 6 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 16/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 3/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 43/100.