Rockwell City Rotary Club

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
237097353
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2021–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Rockwell City, IA, USA
Phone
7128309124
Rating
76
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$76,317
Expenses
$38,915
Assets
$60,233

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Carl Legore (President)

People named in this filing

  • Jo Grodahl (Co-Treasurer)
  • Tina Meth Farrington (Member at large)
  • Lowell Stoolman (Member at large)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Community Service

What it reported doing in 2025

Gave duffle bags and gift bags to foster children in Calhoun County, Christmas gift bags for local care facility residents, Donated to local food pantry, Partnered with local elementary school for Veteran Day Cards to local vets, Presented 2nd graders with dictionaries, Participated in trunk or treat in community, Sponsored and worked Career Day at local middle school, Provided back to school picinic, Sponsored Citizen of the Year and Youth Citizens of the Year, Provided academic scholarships to local seniors, Spponsored 4H awards at county fair, Participated in local town celebration - Sweet Corn Days, Provided snacks for test week at schools, Sponsored two students to attend, RYLA, Participated in Hefer Projects, Donation to academic decathlon and sponsored high schools achievement banquet, Sponsored Interact Club field trip, Adopt a Pet project, City sign project, refurbished She Her House at city park.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 56% for direct work, 31% for grants, and 13% for member benefits.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of total spending goes to programs and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 69
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 66
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 51%; rating input score 51
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 49%; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.55; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 20.1% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 26.2% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 44.5% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 51% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $39K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2021 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 51/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 59/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.