Rockettes of Visalia
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 920426687
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2022–2023
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2023
- Location
- Tipton, CA, USA
- Phone
- 5597994848
- Rating
- 71
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Youth Development Programs
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $40,692
- Expenses
- $29,916
- Assets
- $24,119
- Liabilities
- $1,300
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MICHELLE GIBBONS (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- MICHELLE GIBBONS (PRESIDENT)
- CHARLENE WILLIAMS (TREASURER)
- KRISTIN MAURER (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To teach responsibility to youth by encouraging an interest in horseback riding by educating and training youth under the age of 18 to ride, care for and train horses. The club will assist its active youth members in competitions & community events.
What it reported doing in 2023
The organization was involved in 3 rodeo competitions related to its mission to encourage youths to ride, care for and train horses.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 72% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 65
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 58
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 57.5%; rating input score 57
- Program expense ratio: 78.2%; rating input score 78
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 26.5%; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.81; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.05; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 108.3% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 66.8% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 57.5% of revenue deployed · 78.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $23K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2022 to 2023
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 57/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 40/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 22/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.