Rock Canyon Band Boosters Incorporated
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 472596207
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2023–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2022
- Location
- Highlands Ranch, CO, USA
- Phone
- 4802157371
- Rating
- 77
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Single Organization Support
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $74,886
- Expenses
- $61,331
- Assets
- $95,497
- Liabilities
- $16,800
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
22 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- LINDA KELLY (CO-PRESIDENT)
- KRISTA FINNEY (CO-PRESIDENT)
- LORI TWEHUES (CO-VICE PRESIDENT)
- LORI STRICKLAND (CO-VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- LINDA KELLY (CO-PRESIDENT)
- KRISTA FINNEY (CO-PRESIDENT)
- LORI TWEHUES (CO-VICE PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The Rock Canyon Band Boosters support the Rock Canyon High School bands program, which includes Concert, Jazz, Symphonic, Marching Band (with Color Guard), and the Winter Color Guard program. Our organizations purpose is to provide operating funds, volunteer services, and organizational coordination as requested by the Band Director. Our support includes planning and staffing volunteers to run band concerts, competitions, fundraisers, and banquets; collecting funds through charitable donations and fees; and supplementing school funding to pay for band equipment, transportation, music arrangements, food, and consulting band staff. We support music and arts education for students in a public high school setting.
What it reported doing in 2024
See schedule o.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 81
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 59
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 75%; rating input score 75
- Program expense ratio: 91.6%; rating input score 92
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 18.1%; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.56; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.18; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -14.1% per year; rating input score 0; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -10.7% per year; rating input score 0; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 37.8% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 75% of revenue deployed · 91.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $56K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 22 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 59/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 15/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.