Rochester School for the Deaf

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
160761231
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Rochester, NY, USA
Phone
5855441240
Rating
83
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Specialized Education Institutions

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$15,706,663
Expenses
$14,061,692
Assets
$18,967,083
Liabilities
$2,947,991

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

23 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ANTONY MCLETCHIE (SUPERINTENDENT/CEO)
  • M TIM ALBERT (PRESIDENT)
  • LORI DEWINDT (VICE PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • ANTONY MCLETCHIE (SUPERINTENDENT/CEO): $269,574 total reported compensation
  • SALLY ATKINS (DIR. OF BUSINESS OPERATION): $144,023 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Mission: rochester school for the deaf (rsd) provides exemplary opportunities in a bilingual environment to meet students' unique learning. Together, as a community, rsd challenges and prepares students for participation in the ever-changing world by: - creating an environment that empowers academic achievement, enables communication, and enriches social engagement; - using both proven and innovative programming along with current technologies; and - nurturing students in mind, body, and spiritedness culminating in self-awareness, cultural identity and pride.

What it reported doing in 2024

Education and related services - rochester school for the deaf (rsd) provides educational programs for deaf and hard of hearing children newborn to age 22, through funding from the New York state department of education (nysed). These programs are based on the unique language, communication, educational, and social needs of each child appointed to the school by the nysed. At the end of the 2024-2025 school year, rsd served 136 students from 33 school districts in 12 counties. Children were enrolled in deaf infant, pre-kindergarten, elementary, middle, and high school programs (New York state registered programs awarding regents and high school diplomas, career development and occupational studies commencement credentials, and skills and achievement commencement credentials). Accomplishments for this school year include: - at the early childhood center, the family instructional and resource service team (f.i.r.s.t.) program and preschool served 21 babies and toddlers with home visits and in-person classes. An additional 12 students attended preschool on campus. Assessments and standards were used to plan curriculum and instruction, with a focus on language, cognition, social-emotional learning and self-help, physical development, and belonging. Authentic hands-on instruction is based on the students interests and is play based. In our 4-year olds classrooms, we follow nys prekindergarten learning standards. Communication classes address the ifsp/iep goals for individual children, focusing on language development and other skills. The natural playground/outdoor classroom extends the learning space, fostering creativity and supporting gross motor, language, cognition, and social emotional development. Staff continue to develop a rich library of asl storytime videos as a resource to families, and offered asl storytime at a local library, as well as the zoo and museums as part of deaf culture celebrations. - in our k-12 program, enrollment at the end of the school year was as follows: elementary (k-5) 48, middle school (6-8) 19, and high school (9-12) 36. Rsd graduated 4 seniors: 1 with nys regents diplomas, 2 with a local diploma, and 1 with a skills and achievement credential. The robust k-12 curriculum was supplemented by the positive behavioral interventions and supports program and programming to support belonging, cultural identity and pride, including numerous outside visitors. A new career and technical education program continues to be developed. The bilingual (asl-english) literacy continues to be an area of focus and development, with the addition of a bilingual grammar curriculum specifically designed for deaf learners. A series of workshops for parents and students addressed needs identified in parent surveys, including topics such as literacy learning, asl skills and deaf culture, and drugs, alcohol and addiction. Students participated in a wide range of athletics, clubs, and programs, including chess club, jr. Nad, battle of the books, gallaudet's academic bowl, ntid math competition, and more. Esports was added to the opportunities, and rsd won the first-ever national deaf scholastic esports championship. Athletics, in particular, plays an important role in the lives of students and point of pride at rsd, with extensive travel to other deaf schools for tournaments. Rsd hosted the esdaa volleyball championship tournament for over 10 deaf schools from the eastern part of united states.- learning continued in the ecc and grades k-8 with an extended 6-week school year program (summer school) designed to support qualifying students with their iep goals. In summer 2024, high school students had the opportunity to participate in a residential independent living program, internships at the university of rochester's wilmot cancer institute, and a work experience program.- family engagement and communication remains a priority, with regular updates/newsletters, frequent communication between school leaders and home, and a var

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 82% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and assets have declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 80
  • Transparency & Controls: 84
  • Accountability: 92
  • Sustainability: 62
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 80.4%; rating input score 80
  • Program expense ratio: 88.4%; rating input score 88
  • Fundraising efficiency: $19.43 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Pass
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 95.5%; rating input score 95; 29th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 10.5%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.35; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.16; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 2.9%; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 1.3% per year; rating input score 100; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 1.7% per year; rating input score 100; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -0.8% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 80.4% of revenue deployed · 88.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 21 of 22 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $12.4M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $270K · 23 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $159K reported
  • Consistency: 33 of 33 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 56/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 47/100.