Rochester Presbyterian Home

Legal name: Rochester Presbyterian Home Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
160743142
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Official website data refreshed
Jul 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Rochester, NY, USA
Phone
5852359100
Rating
83
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Supportive Housing for Older Adults
Affiliation
Christianity

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$14,424,181
Expenses
$15,627,381
Assets
$6,061,098
Liabilities
$3,060,679

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

18 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Ronald Norris (President)
  • Andrew Kay (Vice President)
  • Brenden Mance (Vice President)
  • Anne Gallese (Executive Director)

Highest reported compensation

  • Anne Gallese (Executive Director): $232,516 total reported compensation
  • Barbara Bennett Chief (Financial Officer (Beginning 4/24)): $123,623 total reported compensation
  • Bonny Claxton Chief (Financial Officer (Through 4/24)): $107,727 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Operation of homes for the elderly and individuals with dementia. Each employee plays a supportive role in our mission aspiring to give the best possible care and enabling a fulfilling way of life for our Elders. We hire staff who are not just skilled, but intuitively compassionate and kind. Each staff member receives extensive training in delivering our unique approach to care. Employees learn about dementia and how best to care for those living with memory loss. We engage staff members in Eden Alternative retreats to help staff understand our vision for Elder Care and to begin sharing the responsibility for assuring the highest quality of life for our Elders. Care Partners & Shahbazim.

What it reported doing in 2024

The Home provides residential and personal care services for up to 206 residents. 169 beds are reserved for elders with early, mid-stage, and advanced dementia and 37 beds are reserved for alert and oriented persons. Services include nursing and resident aide staff who provide direct care to the residents including evaluation, medication management, personal grooming, housekeeping and laundry. The Home also provides meals and snacks according to the dietary needs of the residents; staff to address the social, psychological and spiritual needs of the residents; and staff to maintain the property as a warm and caring home for the residents. The Home had approximately 55,088 resident care days in 2024. (Continued on Schedule O)All three residences offered an "enhanced program", a program that allows elders to "age in place". The Enhanced Adult Living Residence license allows staff to provide more assistance with ambulation, eating, and behavioral challenges as the elders' dementia progresses and function deteriorates. This is a time when the elders need the most help and a time when they deserve the utmost respect.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 91% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 93% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 81
  • Transparency & Controls: 85
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 20
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 94.1%; rating input score 94
  • Program expense ratio: 86.9%; rating input score 87
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 92.3%; rating input score 92; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 5 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 83
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Pass
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -8.3%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.39; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.5; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 3%; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 6.8% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 6.5% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -6.2% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 1 operating location identified
  • Where the money goes: 94.1% of revenue deployed · 86.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 15 of 15 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $13.6M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $233K · 18 people listed · 5 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 29 of 30 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 3 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 12/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 11/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 28/100.