Rochelle Park American Legion Post 170
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 226029933
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2022
- Forms available
- Form 990 2022
- Location
- Rochelle Park, NJ, USA
- Phone
- 2018439683
- Rating
- 77
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $365,789
- Expenses
- $383,275
- Assets
- $41,243
- Liabilities
- $128,677
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
People named in this filing
- DENNIS DUDDIE (COMMANDER)
- RAY STITZ (SR VICE COMMANDER)
- MARTY KRUEGEL (JR VICE COMMANDER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The rochelle park american legion post 170's mission is to support the american legion programs for the community, children and veterans.
What it reported doing in 2022
Benefits to the veterans, members and community.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 87% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 77
- Transparency & Controls: 93
- Accountability: 64
- Sustainability: 25
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 80.2%; rating input score 80
- Program expense ratio: 76.6%; rating input score 77
- Fundraising efficiency: $23.92 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 1 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 14
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -4.8%; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.11; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 3.12; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 0.2% per year; rating input score 100; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 2.5% per year; rating input score 100; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -3.1% per year; rating input score 0; 16th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 80.2% of revenue deployed · 76.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 440 of 440 board members independent · 1 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 23 of 23 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes grants
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2011 to 2022
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 6 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 32/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 6/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 1/100.