Roby Livestock Boosters

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
842131040
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2021–2022
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2022
Location
Roby, TX, USA
Rating
77
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$93,578
Expenses
$57,001
Assets
$44,532

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • RILEY BARRNET (President & CEO)
  • JAMES JEFFERY (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • RILEY BARRNET (President & CEO)
  • JAMES JEFFERY (Vice President)
  • SHANA BROWN (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Support students enrolled in agriculture education in Roby Consolidated Independent School District. Funds raised will be used to help students purchase show animals and provide prize money at the local and county livestock shows. Support of these agriculture activities helps students develop knowledge and skills with animal health and care for future agriculture careers.

What it reported doing in 2022

A Fall 2022 fund raiser provided sufficient funds to support agriculture students with prize money for the local show in the Spring 2023. All net fund raising proceeds were ultimately for the benefit of student participants.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 76
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 58
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 60.9%; rating input score 61
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 39.1%; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.78; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -47% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 2.8% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 139.4% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 60.9% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $57K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2021 to 2022
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 37/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.