The Reaumond Foundation
Legal name: Robert a Reaumond Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 831155994
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2020–2025
- Official website data refreshed
- Jul 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2018
- Location
- Chicago, IL, United States
- Phone
- 3129351476
- Rating
- 55
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Public Foundations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $362,592
- Expenses
- $192,983
- Assets
- $467,238
- Liabilities
- $92,050
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- PAUL REAUMOND (PRESIDENT)
- LAUREN REAUMOND (VICE PRESIDENT)
- ALYSSA CASSATA (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
People named in this filing
- PAUL REAUMOND (PRESIDENT)
- CONNOR REAUMOND (SECRETARY)
- TYLER REAUMOND (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The Reaumond Foundation is fiercely committed to impacting the lives of those faced with pancreatic cancer by funding research, providing financial assistance to families, and low-cost housing for use during treatment at the nations #1 ranked cancer hospital, MD Anderson Cancer Center. This grant establishes the first scholar program within the Pancreatic Cancer department of MD Anderson. The three-year commitment will help fund an early physician-scientist establish accreditation within the field and help mold a career path in pancreatic cancer research. This program will be overseen by MD Anderson's Pancreatic Moonshot Program co-leader, Dr. Anirban Maitra. The University of Arizona Cancer Center: $150,000 This three-year commitment will provide research initiatives and accelerate the ability to prevent, detect, and eventually cure pancreatic cancer. Specifically, this donation...
What it reported doing in 2025
This organization is organized and operated exclusively for charitable purposes within the meaning of section 501(c)(3), internal revenue code. Specifically, the distributing of contributions, gifts, grants, bequests, devises and inheritances, to be applied to charitable, philanthropic, educational and religious activities without segregation or discrimination as to race, creed or religoin of its beneficiaries; and to make its grants and funds either directly to or for said purposes, or to existing institutions engaged in like or similar activities or programs.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 81% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 25
- Transparency & Controls: 87
- Accountability: 64
- Sustainability: 70
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 21%; rating input score 21
- Program expense ratio: 39.5%; rating input score 39
- Fundraising efficiency: $1.28 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 93.8%; rating input score 94; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 1 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 14
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Fail
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 46.8%; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.42; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.2; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -8.2% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 7.9% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 13.2% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 3 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 21% of revenue deployed · 39.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 4 of 4 board members independent · 1 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $76K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 22 of 23 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2020 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 21/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 39/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 6 not reported.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 7/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 16/100.