Roadhouse Student Services Nfp
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 203401812
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2010–2013
- Forms available
- Form 990 2011, Form 990-EZ 2013
- Location
- Aurora, IL, USA
- Phone
- 6305857777
- Rating
- 91
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Student Services, Organizations of Students
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $145,812
- Expenses
- $148,457
- Assets
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DONALD STUBBLEFIELD (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- DONALD STUBBLEFIELD (PRESIDENT)
- MATT STOVALL (DIRECTOR)
- JOHN ARDIS (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The organization is a faith based outreach program for at risk teens. The program is designed to reach into the community to address the social, spiritual and moral needs of today's youth, building positive influences into their lives so they may become assets to society & spread the love & gospel of jesus amoung teens, friends & families.
What it reported doing in 2013
Approximately 2500-3000 students and their friends participated in the events, activities and mission trips conducted by this faith based outreach program
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 99
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 22
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 99.7%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 97.9%; rating input score 98
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -1.8%; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -2.2% per year; rating input score 0; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -6.1% per year; rating input score 0; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -95.3% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 99.7% of revenue deployed · 97.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $145K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2010 to 2013
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 30/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.