Road Wolves of Matthews Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
461285286
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2014–2021
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2021, Form 990-N 2017
Location
Charlotte, NC, USA
Phone
8643468687
Rating
68
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Community Service Clubs

Reported finances

Revenue
$7,880
Expenses
$3,733
Assets
$11,483

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • KOBEE MOORE (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • KOBEE MOORE (PRESIDENT)
  • CARLOS MARTIN (SECRETARY)
  • BOBBY DENDY (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Matthews road wolves is a motorcycle club that focuses on providing support and a consciousness to local and area nonprofit organizations. Through their efforts they try to come up with innovative ways to raise money and awareness so that the organization can continue providing service to those that desperately need it. Most of the riders with the matthews road wolves are law enforcement officers who are taking something they love to do, "ride motercycles- and give back to the community. Charties this club is associated with include: crisis assistance ministry, police athletic league, wounded warrier project, and the alzheimer's association, back to school campaign, charlotte rescue mission. The road wolves are also working, in association with the charlotte police department, in various charlotte-mecklenburg schools to assist at-risk children.

What it reported doing in 2021

Providing support and a consciousness to local and area nonprofit organizations.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 62
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 68
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 44.3%; rating input score 44
  • Program expense ratio: 93.4%; rating input score 93

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 52.6%; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.08; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -0.4% per year; rating input score 0; 57th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -18% per year; rating input score 0; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 2.7% per year; rating input score 100; 48th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 44.3% of revenue deployed · 93.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $3K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 7 filing years from 2014 to 2021
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 44/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.