Road Safe America
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 200266556
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2022
- Forms available
- Form 990 2022, Form 990-EZ 2011
- Location
- Washington, DC, USA
- Phone
- 2026690896
- Rating
- 84
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Automotive Safety
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $183,734
- Expenses
- $712,018
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
27 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- STEPHEN OWINGS (PRESIDENT)
- SUSAN OWINGS (VICE PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- LOUISE MONTI (SECRETARY/TREASURER): $10,000 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The organization promotes commercial truck safety via regular public addresses, media interviews, direct mail campaigns, press releases and frequent meetings with elected officials and regulators. Annual programs include drive safer sunday each thanksgiving weekend.
What it reported doing in 2022
The organization uses outreach programs such as passenger car driver education and drive safer sunday to remind car drivers of the dangers inherent when driving along with heavy commerical vehicles. The organization also uses their website as a cost effective way to keep their message in front of all drivers. The organization communicates via newsletters and postcards sent regularly to thousands of interested followers of its work.the organization dissolved in 2023 and has granted all the remaining assets to another nonprofit defined in schedule n with a similar mission.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 66% of its reported program spending out as grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 93
- Transparency & Controls: 94
- Accountability: 74
- Sustainability: 5
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 96.7%; rating input score 97
- Fundraising efficiency: $14.29 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 38
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -287.5%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 1.4%; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 16.7% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 2.1% per year; rating input score 100; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -2.1% per year; rating input score 0; 19th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 96.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 18 of 18 board members independent · 3 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $688K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $10K · 27 people listed
- Consistency: 20 of 20 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2012 to 2022
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 8 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 1/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 48/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 38/100.