ROAD RUNNERS CLUB OF AMERICA Pagoda Pacers Athletic Club

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
232860840
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2021–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Reading, PA, USA
Phone
6104137758
Rating
74
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$99,785
Expenses
$94,782
Assets
$103,185
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

11 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Michelle Henry (President)
  • Lisa Domeshek (Vice President - Director)

People named in this filing

  • Michelle Henry (President)
  • Lisa Domeshek (Vice President - Director)
  • Shaun Luther (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Purpose of the Pagoda Pacers Athletic Club is to develop and promote distance running and racing, road and trail biking, distance swimming, biathlons, triathlons, adventure races, and other individually oriented sports involving human powered motion in the greater Reading, PA area, provide information and social activities, and to enhance training opportunities in a supportive atmosphere for athletes of all abilities. The Pagoda Pacers A.C. has a membership of over 250 members who participate and volunteer at club races and events. The Pagoda Pacers A.C. is a sanctioned member of the Road Runners Club of America, a nationwide governing body for recreational running clubs.

What it reported doing in 2025

Scholarships The Program provides financial assistance to distance runners and promotes running

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 94% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 94% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 71
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 54
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 69.2%; rating input score 69
  • Program expense ratio: 74.3%; rating input score 74

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 5%; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.09; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -5.6% per year; rating input score 0; 35th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 4.2% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 4.1% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 69.2% of revenue deployed · 74.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $70K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2021 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 53/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 50/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.