Road Runners Club of America Fleet Feet Knoxville Running Club
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 261907253
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2022–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2008
- Location
- Knoxville, TN, USA
- Phone
- 8656753338
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Sports Associations &Training Facilities
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $121,135
- Expenses
- $133,514
- Assets
- $59,855
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
2 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Shahin Hadian (Director/President)
- Cheryl Hadian (Director/Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Shahin Hadian (Director/President)
- Cheryl Hadian (Director/Vice President)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The promotion and encouragement of running and the education of the public to its benefits. Other objectives are to engage in community activities and to publicize by appropriate means the benefits of running as a means of physical fitness.
What it reported doing in 2024
2024 Training Programs - 115 participants joined our training programs that consisted of both seasonal sessions as well as weekly events. Organize, supervise, and promote the training program sessions. Encourage participants to complete each session and join the next. Provided participants educational knowledge to stay on course and develop a life long habit in running.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 95% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and assets have declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 84
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 34
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 86.6%; rating input score 87
- Program expense ratio: 78.6%; rating input score 79
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -10.2%; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.45; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 23.2% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 17.2% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -14.5% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 86.6% of revenue deployed · 78.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 6 filed program accomplishments · $105K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 2 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 15/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 35/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.