Road Runners Club of America Aka Cypress Running Club
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 461717259
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2014–2016
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2016, Form 990-N 2013
- Location
- Cypress, TX, USA
- Phone
- 2813894776
- Rating
- 84
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Amateur Sports
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $83,076
- Expenses
- $69,213
- Assets
- $64,102
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Patrick Gomez (President)
- Ashley Bass (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Patrick Gomez (President)
- Ashley Bass (Vice President)
- Tara Wright (Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The primary objectives of the Club are to promote running as a sport and to promote jogging as one component of a healthy lifestyle of Club members of all abilities. In furtherance of this objective, the Club hosts group runs, training runs and programs on the road and/or track, clinics and/or educational lectures about topics of interest for runners, social events for members and their families, and all such other things as may be conducive to the encouragement of running. The Club also engages in community activities to publicize the benefits of running as a means of physical fitness.
What it reported doing in 2016
Promote the sport of running throughout the Cypress TX area.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Member-benefit provider. The nonprofit used 100% of its reported program spending for member benefits.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 86
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 54
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 79.8%; rating input score 80
- Program expense ratio: 95.8%; rating input score 96
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 16.7%; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.93; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 22.1% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 15.7% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 25.5% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 79.8% of revenue deployed · 95.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $66K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2014 to 2016
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 45/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.