RML Specialty Hospital

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
364113692
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Hinsdale, IL, USA
Phone
630.286.4100
Rating
85
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Standard
Sector
Hospital, General

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$103,848,771
Expenses
$102,204,011
Assets
$122,610,427
Liabilities
$55,231,822

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

19 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • James Prister (President/CEO)
  • Dale Hengensbach (Executive Director Special Stategic Projects)
  • Karen Murtaugh (Executive Director Human Resources)
  • Laurie Forssberg (Executive Director Chicago Operations and Clinical Services)

Highest reported compensation

  • James Prister (President/CEO): $767,659 total reported compensation
  • Collin Fizpatrick MD (Physician): $583,819 total reported compensation
  • Muhammad Abushaer MD (Physician): $534,699 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

RML Specialty Hospital is a nationally recognized long-term acute care hospital (LTCH) designed for patients whose needs are too medically complex to go home or to traditional rehabilitation.

What it reported doing in 2024

In the most recent fiscal year (fy 2025), rml specialty hospital delivered on its mission to provide quality, compassionate care to patients from our referring community who suffer from prolonged, severe illness. Our care programs included the care and weaning of patients who require prolonged mechanical ventilation, the care and treatment of patients with complex wounds, and the management of patients requiring extended acute hospitalization. Rml is recognized nationally as a leader in long-term acute care and is one of the largest ventilator-weaning hospitals in the nation. Rml served approximately 90 referral sources throughout Illinois, including partner organizations, major tertiary care centers, and community hospitals. Nearly 90% percent of inpatient admissions were direct transfers from these hospital referral sources. Rml operates a facility located in a low-income area of chicago and, despite fluctuations in census, continues to sustain the viability of an entity that provides quality health care and well-paying jobs for the inner-city community. Long-term acute care was provided to more than 1,038 patients across both rml facilities, including over 354-primarily minority-patients at the chicago location. To support the specialized needs of our patients and community, rml utilizes a physician-led interdisciplinary team to deliver comprehensive treatment for acute or catastrophic illness complicated by multiple co-morbidities. Our commitment to excellence and superior clinical outcomes has allowed us to maintain low hospital-acquired infection and pressure-ulcer rates and a low rate of adverse outcomes, defined as expirations and transfers to acute-care hospitals.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 98% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 84
  • Transparency & Controls: 80
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 39
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 87.7%; rating input score 88
  • Program expense ratio: 88%; rating input score 88
  • Fundraising efficiency: $14.27 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Pass
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 1.6%; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.2; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.45; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 5.6%; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 3.2% per year; rating input score 100; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 4% per year; rating input score 100; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 7.7% per year; rating input score 100; 57th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 7 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 2 operating locations identified
  • Where the money goes: 87.7% of revenue deployed · 88% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 4 of 4 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $89.9M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $768K · 19 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $6.8M reported
  • Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 15 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 50/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 40/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 46/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 13/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 40/100.