RIZE Prevention
Legal name: RIZE Prevention Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 871458544
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2022–2025
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2021
- Location
- Mauldin, SC, USA
- Phone
- (864) 373-9003
- Rating
- 85
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $497,197
- Expenses
- $596,831
- Assets
- $531,731
- Liabilities
- $5,370
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Timothy Sebold (President)
- Bryan Marzzarella (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Timothy Sebold (President)
- Eric Nash (Treasurer)
- Dr Leigh Holcomb (Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
RIZE Prevention's iRIZE program delivers certified youth leadership and substance use prevention training to schools and communities across Upstate South Carolina and beyond.
What it reported doing in 2025
We provide the iRIZE program, which is an evidence-based approach to primary and secondary prevention for youth. iRIZE was built on our innovative, signature prevention methodology and comprehensive relational system of care model. We provide iRIZE free of charge to middle schools in South Carolina, thanks to grants and donations we receive for this program. Having conducting a 4-year pilot study in collaboration with SC Department of Education and school districts in Upstate SC, we are confident about the efficacy of our evidence-informed approach and our implementation of evidence-based drug prevention programming and peer led social norm interventions. This 4-month program serves students in the 6th, 7th and 8th grades. Access to our Community Connector resource tool is given to all students, parents and school staff associated with those schools. We are now piloting our Mission iRIZE initiative to provide our facets of our iRIZE program to high school and college students- via our participation in the SC POWER Collective Co-op for opioid addiction and overdose prevention- along with all our support resources and counseling/coaching services. During the 2025-26 academic year, RIZE Prevention provided the iRIZE program to 20 middle schools and conducted over 50 program presentations for approximately 7,300 students, parents and school staff. For schools that implemented our program with high fidelity, approximately, 89% of 6th graders who received our iRIZE program signed the iRIZE Pledge to be drug-free. Approximately, 85% of 7th graders who received the second-year installation of our program signed the pledge. Approximately, 69% of 8th graders who received the third-year of our program signed the pledge. We provided our Mission iRIZE program to 6 high schools and 1 college, reaching approximately 9,000 students. We also provide one-on-one coaching and licensed clinical counseling to teens, regardless of if they attend a school that receives our iRIZE program. This coaching is administered through our staff members, each of who are IAAMC certified through The Addictions Academy. During the 2025-26 academic year, we coached over 100 teens, 80% of who chose to remain sober and refrain from drug usage after completing the coaching program. That is a 400% increase from the previous year. We also connected multiple youth to outside clinical resources to address substance use and/or co-occurring mental health disorders.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 61% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 83
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 88
- Sustainability: 29
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 92.7%; rating input score 93
- Program expense ratio: 77.2%; rating input score 77
- Fundraising efficiency: $16.77 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -20%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.89; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 27.6% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 24.7% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 34.9% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 5 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 5 operating locations identified
- Where the money goes: 92.7% of revenue deployed · 77.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 8 of 8 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $461K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
- Consistency: 28 of 28 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2022 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 51/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 11/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 38/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 39/100.