Rivma Companion Animal Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
201541257
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Providence, RI, USA
Phone
4017510944
Rating
72
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$171,597
Expenses
$170,072
Assets
$818,747
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

11 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • CLAIRE MESSINA (President)
  • M CHRISTIE SMITH (Past President)

People named in this filing

  • PATTY SULLIVAN (Treasurer)
  • CLAIRE MESSINA (President)
  • M CHRISTIE SMITH (Past President)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The organization was established to provide financial assistance to low-income pet owners who cannot afford necessary veterinarian care for their pets. The organization's primary mission is affordable healthcare for all pets.

What it reported doing in 2024

The Rhode Island veterinary medical association companion animal foundation is a non-profit organization that was established to provide financial assistance to low-income pet owners so that they can afford essential veterinary care for their sick or injured pets. The organization's goal is affordable healthcare for all pets. This is the first veterinary based assistance program of its kind in the united states and is currrently the largest resource for meeting the overwhelming need for urgent care for the pets in Rhode Island. The organizaton is governed by a veterinary and community based board of directors and has received excellent support from veterinarians and the general public. Pet owners must be income eligible for assistance to be given by the organization.low-income guidelines were modeled on the hud community median income standards, as well as owner participation in such programs as food stamps, heating assistance, and other similar resources. The organizaton established this set of eligibility criteria so that veterinarians can easily determine whether a client is able to participate in the program at the time the patient is examined.the absence of any sort of waiting period for funding makes emergency care possible, and there is no cumbersome documentation required of the participants. The organization audits 10% of fund recipients each year to verify accurate reporting. Because these grants are so accessible, veterinarians have the flexibility to offer immediate treatment plans to eligible clients, at the time the need is more urgent.the organization raises funds through grants, events, individual contributions and a veterinary patient memorial program. Funds are then primarily used for an annual disbursement that the state's veterinarians use to treat their eligible clients pets. The very modest remainder supports the organization's administrative needs, with the organization's day to day business being the responsibility of volunteers. The organization has also set up and endowment account that will help the organization serve the needy pet owners into the forseeable future.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 57
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 76
  • Sustainability: 60
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 64.9%; rating input score 65
  • Program expense ratio: 56%; rating input score 56
  • Fundraising efficiency: $5.17 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 3 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 43
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 0.9%; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.81; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -3.2% per year; rating input score 0; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 2.8% per year; rating input score 100; 40th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 4.8% per year; rating input score 100; 46th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 64.9% of revenue deployed · 56% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 11 of 11 board members independent · 3 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $95K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
  • Consistency: 23 of 23 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 56/100.
  • Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 6 not reported.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 23/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 41/100.