Riverview High School Band Boosters
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 203718038
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2023–2023
- Forms available
- Form 990 2023, Form 990-EZ 2022, Form 990-N 2020
- Location
- Riverview, FL, USA
- Phone
- 8136715011
- Rating
- 60
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Single Organization Support
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $234,417
- Expenses
- $217,786
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Doris Stamper (President)
- Kim Smith (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Lydia Lewis (Secretary)
- Doris Stamper (President)
- Lisa Tackus (Fundraising)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of the Riverview Band Program is to inspire all students, families and spectators to better themselves and their community through the musical, marching and pageantry arts; outstanding citizenship and high academic achievements. We strive for our students to set goals for themselvesand then formulate a plan to achieve them. We strive for our students to create, sustain and appreciate a culture of togethernessto value each other because of their differences and their lived experiences. We strive for our students to learn how to leadand how to follow; they are the next generation of leaders and must be informed, passionate and dedicated. We strive for our students to be accountable for their actions, disciplined in their lives and humble enough to ask for helpand to demand the same attitude from their peers. Above all else, we strive for our students to be upstanding members of societytoday and always.
What it reported doing in 2023
Indoor pageantry arts education support
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 99% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 30
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 82
- Sustainability: 35
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 33.5%; rating input score 33
- Program expense ratio: 36%; rating input score 36
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 57
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 7.1%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 38.3% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -81.7% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 33.5% of revenue deployed · 36% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 14 of 14 board members independent · 4 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $217K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 42 of 43 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 33/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 36/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 6 not reported.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 56/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.