Riverside Mercy Hospital
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 311556401
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2013
- Forms available
- Form 990 2013
- Location
- Toledo, OH, USA
- Phone
- 4192518936
- Rating
- 70
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $93,635,924
- Expenses
- $85,228,067
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
47 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ANDREA PRICE (PRESIDENT & CEO, MHP-NORTHERN MARKET)
- BRAD BERTKE (PRESIDENT & CEO)
- JACALYN LIEBOWITZ (SVP Nursing, Interim CEO St Charles Hospital)
- KEVIN COOK (PRESIDENT & CEO, MSVMC & METRO HOSPITALS)
- PAMELA KADLICK (VICE PRESIDENT - PATIENT CARE & CNO)
Highest reported compensation
- STEVEN L MICKUS (FORMER OFFICER): $2,882,500 total reported compensation
- BRIAN SMITH (TRUSTEE, CHP EVP NETWORKS): $939,513 total reported compensation
- SAMANTHA PLATZKE (FORMER OFFICER): $636,072 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The primary exempt purpose of mercy st. Anne hospital is to extend the healing ministry of jesus by improving the health of our communities with emphasis on people who are poor and under-served. Mercy st. Anne hospital accomplishes this purpose by demonstrating behaviors reflecting our core values of compassion, excellence, human dignity, justice, sacredness of life and service.
What it reported doing in 2013
The primary exempt purpose of mercy st. Anne hospital is to extend the healing ministry of jesus by improving the health of our communities with emphasis on people who are poor and under-served. Mercy st. Anne hospital accomplishes this purpose by demonstrating behaviors reflecting our core values of compassion, excellence, human dignity, justice, sacredness of life and service. Total charity care provided was $3,663,907 serving 10,365 individuals.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 100% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Revenue has declined or grown slowly and assets have declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 70
- Transparency & Controls: 79
- Accountability: 81
- Sustainability: 37
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 75.8%; rating input score 76
- Program expense ratio: 83.2%; rating input score 83
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 84.6%; rating input score 85; 0th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 66.7%; rating input score 67; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 9%; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 3.9%; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -1.8% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -41% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 75.8% of revenue deployed · 83.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 12 of 18 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $70.9M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $2.9M · 47 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 24 of 24 current checks pass
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes executive pay
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2010 to 2013
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 8 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 102 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 22/100.