Riverside Health Clinic

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
300088838
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2015–2016
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2016
Location
Three Rivers, MI, USA
Phone
2692733744
Rating
84
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Ambulatory Health Center, Community Clinic
Affiliation
Christianity

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$2,072
Expenses
$24,638
Assets
$32,130

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

People named in this filing

  • DENNIS KIROUAC (CHAIRPERSON)
  • STEVEN KUJACZNSKI (VICE-CHAIRPE)
  • JANICE HOFFMASTER (SECRETARY/TR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Riverside health clinic was established to provide basic health care services at no cost to the impoverished residents among the population of three rivers and the surrounding areas of st joseph county by utilizing the volunteer services of various medical professionals in the local area. Riverside health clinic provides free medical care and consultation along with dental referrals to those residents of st joseph county who are unable to afford medical coverage, the unemployed, and individuals attempting to leave the public assistance program.

What it reported doing in 2016

Provided dental services at local dentist offices at no cost to the patient. The clinic paid for the basic services and helped with additional dental services that might need to be provided

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 99
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 24
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 97.8%; rating input score 98

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -1,089.1%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.3; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -69.6% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -11.2% per year; rating input score 0; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -52% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 97.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $24K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2015 to 2016
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 2/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 55/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.