Rivers Run Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
931402003
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2023–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Webster, FL, USA
Phone
3529883280
Rating
36
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Children's, Youth Services

Reported finances

Revenue
$2,000
Expenses
$2,000
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Michael Klokus (President/Director)
  • Kimberly Klokus (Vice-President/Director)

People named in this filing

  • Michael Klokus (President/Director)
  • Kimberly Klokus (Vice-President/Director)
  • Paul Walker (Secretary/Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission of Rivers Run, Inc. is to give children from hard places a second chance at childhood through fostering and adoption and to equip train and educate others doing the same. We offer mentoring, training, coaching, and consulting services for homeschooling, fostering, and adoption, while strengthening and supporting families, parents, and children. Our advocacy integrates strategic partnerships with churches, childcare providers, schools, associations, and other stakeholders. Rivers Run is committed to sharing the Gospel of Jesus Christ through all services, including supporting the Missions.

What it reported doing in 2025

Programs had not yet commenced during the 2025 accounting period. We did, however, achieve a positive determination under IRC 501(c)(3).

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 28
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 0%; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 150% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2023 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 3/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 43/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.